by BeloAdmin | Apr 11, 2024 | Uncategorized
Banfield v Campbell [2018] EWHC 1943 (Ch) Practitioners will be aware that brining a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family Dependants) Act 1975 (“the Inheritance Act 1975”), does not require a subjective assessment of the merits of the Claimant’s case....
by BeloAdmin | Apr 11, 2024 | Uncategorized
As we head into 2024, this article looks at some of the potential developments that may come into the family law arena. 1. Nuptial agreements Perhaps an area of family law that is long overdue for a further step forward is that of nuptial agreements. The Law...
by BeloAdmin | Apr 11, 2024 | Uncategorized
Re GB (Part 25 Application: Parental Alienation) [2023] EWFC 150 Once again the issue of parental alienation is back before our family courts. In the case of Re GB (Part 25 Application: Parental Alienation) [2023] EWFC 150, was very clear that parental alienation must...
by BeloAdmin | Apr 11, 2024 | Uncategorized
Parental alienation is described by Cafcass (expert to the Family Court in private cases) as “when a child’s resistance or hostility towards one parent is not justified and is the result of psychological manipulation by the other parent”. Parental alienation is a...
by BeloAdmin | Apr 11, 2024 | Uncategorized
Butler v Butler [2023] EWHC 2453 (Fam) This case provides an important reminder to all financial remedy practitioners about the fact that where a judge concludes that a case is a needs case, this does not mean that they must make an order that satisfies both parties’...
by BeloAdmin | Apr 11, 2024 | Uncategorized
O v O [2023] EWFC 161 When assessing a financial remedy case, the court will always have to be guided by section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. Family practitioners will all be well aware that conduct appears under Section 25(2)(g). The test for conduct is...
