Resolution: NCDR
Non-court dispute resolution (“NCDR”) in family law encourages separating couples to resolve issues without going to court. Henry Chambers offers the following options to our clients, in addition to our Children Arbitration work, which can be found here
Private FDRs
Unlike a court FDR, which is subject to judicial delays and limited time, a Private FDR offers greater flexibility, confidentiality, and efficiency. It can be scheduled sooner and allows for more time to explore settlement. Although the evaluator’s opinion is not legally binding, it often helps parties reach a voluntary agreement, avoiding further litigation costs and emotional strain.
If no agreement is reached, the process remains confidential and cannot be used in later court hearings. Private FDRs are increasingly encouraged by courts as a practical, cost-effective means of resolving financial disputes in family law.
Henry Chambers can offer barristers to act in the role of the Judge and Jack Henry represents clients at a Private Financial Dispute Resolution.
Early Neutral Evaluation
The goal of ENE is to give parties a realistic view of their case, encouraging them to settle early and avoid lengthy and costly litigation. It is typically held in a private setting, outside of court, and is entirely confidential. The evaluator considers written evidence and legal arguments from both sides and then delivers their view, either orally or in writing. Although not enforceable, the opinion often carries significant weight and helps narrow the issues or prompts settlement.
ENE is distinct from mediation in that the evaluator provides an informed judgment, rather than facilitating negotiation. Overall, ENE offers a quicker, more cost-effective, and less adversarial path to resolution in family law cases.
Henry Chambers has barristers that specialise in both private law children matters and financial remedy matters that can assist in providing an ENE opinion.
Round Table Meeting
The purpose of an RTM is to narrow the issues in dispute and explore settlement options without the pressure of court-imposed deadlines or procedures. Each side presents their position, discusses possible solutions, and negotiates directly or through their lawyers.
Unlike court hearings, RTMs are entirely voluntary and confidential. Any offers made during the meeting are typically made “without prejudice”. RTMs offer greater flexibility, save time and legal costs, and can reduce the emotional strain associated with litigation.
While not legally binding on their own, any agreement reached can later be formalised into a binding court order. RTMs are widely encouraged in family law as a practical and cooperative method for resolving disputes outside the court process.
Henry Chambers can assist with round table meetings in either private law children or financial remedy matters.